Shows
Asian solamente female travellers are challenged by gendered and racialised risks.
Gender intersects with competition in amplifying Asian women’s perception of danger.
Dangers are conceptualised while the unequal power relations underlying tourism room.
Feminine travellers gain reconstruct and empowerment identities through risk-taking.
Specific empowerment may expand to social transformations at a level that is micro.
This study explores how Asian women perceive and negotiate the risks of travelling alone and the meanings of these processes in response to the emergence of the solo female travel market in Asia. The lived experiences of 35 solo female travellers from 10 East and Southeast parts of asia were analysed constructivist that is using concept. The findings expose that Asian solamente travellers that are female concerned with gendered ( e.g. Intimate attack and road harassment) and racialised (e.g. Discrimination and social disapproval) dangers, which imply the unequal energy relations underpinning the gendered and racialised tourism area. The findings additionally expose evidence where sex intersects with battle in amplifying and constructing Asian ladies’ perception of danger. The research sexactly hows just how Asian solo female travellers gained empowerment and experienced self-transformations through negotiating the potential risks and additional reveals exactly exactly how these specific transformations may expand to social transformations at a micro degree in a Asian context.
Past article in problem
Next article in issue
Dr Elaine Chiao Ling Yang is a co-employee Lecture into the Department of Tourism, Sport and resort Management, Griffith University. A PhD is held by her in Tourism from Griffith University. Elaine’s research interest is based on the aspects of Asian tourism, feminine travellers and tourist risk perception. Her works happen posted in Tourism Management, Journal of Travel Research, Current Issues in Tourism, and Journal of Hospitality Marketing and Management. Elaine can be an editorial board user of Tourism Management views and Annals of Leisure Research. This woman is additionally a volunteer administrator of females Academics in Tourism (WAiT).
Share: Elaine Yang contributed towards the conception and design for the task, literature review, data collection, analysis and interpretation of information, drawing implications and summary, drafting and revising the manuscript, handling reviewers’ remarks and communication utilizing the log.
Dr Catheryn Khoo-Lattimore is really A senior lecturer at griffith University, Australia. Catheryletter’s research interest is on tourist and guest behavior, with a separate consider females, families and small children as well as on understanding these portions from A asian viewpoint. Catheryn has co-published two publications: Asian Genders in Tourism and ladies and Travel. Catheryn is Editor-in-Chief of Tourism Management Perspectives and serves from the editorial panels of various other tourism and hospitality journals. She actually is 2nd Vice-Chair associated with the Council for Australasian Tourism and Hospitality Education (CAUTHE). She’s additionally the chair and founder of females Academics in Tourism (WAiT).
Contribution: Catheryn Khoo-Lattimore contributed intellectual input into the entire task including methodology and literary works review, and subsequent critical revisions of numerous drafts associated with the manuscript.
Associate Professor Charles Arcodia may be the Deputy Head associated with the Department of Tourism, Sport and resort Management at Griffith University, Australia. Charles’s research passions are often in the area of occasion management and explore several associated areas such as for example tourism management training and heritage management that is cultural. He could be additionally the Executive Editor associated with the Global Journal of Event Management analysis and it is an editorial board user of five other scholarly journals.
Share: Charles Arcodia contributed towards the conception and design associated with the scholarly research; the interpretation associated with the data therefore the conclusions drawn as a result; reviews associated with the draft paper; and interpretation associated with the reviewers’ reviews, and reaction to the reviewers.